Slay the Princess: A Study in Choice and Consequence

“Slay the Princess,” a psychological horror visual novel from Black Tabby Games, begins innocuously enough—a path through the woods, a lone cabin and a dire task: to slay a princess who could destroy the world. This premise, while simple, unfurls into a complex narrative labyrinth that challenges players not just to play but to ponder deeply about the ethics of choice and the burdens of consequence.

From the moment the game starts, you are immersed in an atmosphere thick with foreboding and mystery. The Narrator and the Voice of the Hero, two intangible presences, accompany you, providing sparse details about your mission and identity. This scarcity of information sets the stage for a game where discovery and decision-making are paramount. Every choice you make feels weighty and consequential, not just for how it impacts the immediate narrative, but for how it reshapes your understanding of the story’s world.

The core gameplay mechanic of “Slay the Princess” is the time loop. Each loop starts with the same walk to the cabin but diverges wildly based on your actions. Whether you choose to engage the princess in conversation, confront her, or attempt to alter your path altogether, each decision leads to distinct narrative branches. This looping mechanism, far from being a mere novelty, serves as a profound narrative device that explores the elasticity of fate and the impact of small choices on broader outcomes.

What sets “Slay the Princess” apart from many other visual novels is its deep integration of these choices into the fabric of its storytelling. This is not a game where choices are merely illusory. Each decision genuinely affects the development of the plot and characters. The princess herself is a prime example of this dynamic. Initially presented as a potential world-destroyer, her character evolves based on your interactions with her. She can become monstrous or remain tragically human, reflecting not just your choices but the cumulative effects of past loops.

This mutable approach to character development is mirrored in the game’s visual and auditory presentation. The art style—stark, monochromatic, and eerily beautiful—creates a haunting backdrop that complements the story’s dark themes. Each iteration of the cabin and the princess is rendered with careful detail, visually representing the narrative changes wrought by your decisions. Voice acting adds another layer of immersion, with performances that adapt to the shifting tones of the narrative, enhancing both the game’s emotional depth and its unsettling atmosphere.

However, “Slay the Princess” is not without its faults. The game’s humor, which it frequently employs, can at times feel at odds with its more serious elements. While the dark comedy provides a necessary respite from the game’s more intense moments, it occasionally undermines the gravity of the choices you face. Additionally, the multitude of voices that can guide or mislead you—the Hero, the Smitten, the Paranoid, among others—sometimes clutter the narrative, making it difficult to parse the significance of each decision.

Despite these criticisms, the game excels in its exploration of themes like destiny, identity, and morality. It prompts players to question not only the actions of their character but also the underlying ethics of those actions. What does it mean to be a hero? Is it merely following a path laid out by others, or is it forging your own, even if that path is fraught with uncertainty and potential danger?

The narrative complexity of “Slay the Princess” is further enriched by its endings, each a reflection of the choices made throughout the game. These endings range from the deeply tragic to the bizarrely surreal, offering a spectrum of conclusions that feel earned and impactful. It’s a testament to the game’s design that each ending provides a different perspective on the game’s central questions, encouraging players to re-examine their choices and perhaps even their personal beliefs.

The replay value of “Slay the Princess” is significant, not just for the pleasure of uncovering all the narrative possibilities but for the insights each playthrough offers into the characters and the game’s world. This replayability is a double-edged sword, however. On one hand, it invites deep engagement with the game’s rich narrative landscape. On the other, it can be daunting, as the sheer volume of choices and outcomes might overwhelm some players.

In conclusion, “Slay the Princess” is a masterclass in narrative game design. It challenges the conventions of the visual novel genre by offering a deeply interactive and thoughtful experience that respects the player’s intelligence and emotional capacity. While it may stumble occasionally in its execution—through uneven humor and a crowded chorus of voices—these are minor flaws in an otherwise exceptional game. It scores an impressive 8.5 out of 10, standing out as a must-play for fans of the genre and for anyone interested in the power of narrative to explore complex, often uncomfortable questions about human nature and morality. In the end, “Slay the Princess” doesn’t just entertain. It transforms the act of play into a profound inquiry into the nature of choice and consequence, leaving a lasting impact long after the final credits roll.

About the author


  1. I’m glad you got to explore Slay the Princess to a level of depth! The themes are quite interesting and the layers of narrative indeed make it standout in the genre, despite being pretty new. I also think the criticisms you’ve mentioned are very valid, and I would add to that a couple things.

    The experience itself and writing and design choices are thoughtful well executed, but I did also think some of the flaws you mention end up making the overall story being told feel not as clear thematically. It’s not bad by any means, but I’d definitely say the early questions and explorations of choice are more polished than the note Slay the Princess wants to land on. I also think the replayability double-edged-swordness has another aspect where the focus on many playthroughs does mean less importance on any one particular playthrough. This isn’t a huge issue and each run is still pretty engaging, but I can see less investment, and thus engagement, with many many runs–plus I do want more significance than what’s already present on the princesses one does end up using!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.