Critical Play – Games of Chance Noah Wong

Target audience: 4+ (but in Casinos that is higher obviously)

Name of the game: Poker

Game’s creator: n/a

Platform of the game: Card Game

Last night, I went to Matrix Casino for the first time and observed my friends, who come more often than I realized, played poker. Some participants spoke of luck as a core part of their identity, lamenting or celebrating their “natural” fortune or misfortune. Others analyzed their wins as streaks of luck, separate from their strategic plays. In the blend of skill and chance, many attributed their victories to strategic prowess, even when luck was clearly at play. This nuanced interaction of player perception with the mechanics of probability provides a rich ground for examining the potential addictive qualities of these games.

Games of chance exploit the psychological principle known as the “gambler’s fallacy,” where players believe that past events can influence future outcomes in random processes. For example, in the games I watched, I saw players talk about how a “hot streak” was incoming after a series of losses, despite each hand being statistically independent. This misinterpretation of randomness can lead to increased betting, prolonged play, and, ultimately, higher risk of addiction.

Comparisons with Other Games of Chance

Compared to purely luck-based games like slots, poker offers a blend of skill and chance that can mislead players into believing they can control the outcome through skill alone. While skill is definitely part of what allows players to win, this illusion of control is a potent catalyst for addiction. Slots, while simpler, are designed to captivate players through fast-paced play and frequent small wins, encouraging continued play through constant engagement and immediate gratification.

Psychological Engagement with Probability

Poker’s engagement with probability is complex. It not only involves understanding the odds of winning a hand but also predicting opponents’ actions and bluffing. This deeper engagement with the game’s mechanics can make it more absorbing and, for some, more addictive. Players are drawn into a cognitive loop where each hand presents a new puzzle of odds and psychology, feeding into the compulsion to play “just one more hand.”

Randomness and Addiction

The randomness inherent in these games can significantly feed into addiction. The unpredictability of outcomes triggers a release of dopamine, a neurotransmitter linked to pleasure and reward in the brain. Over time, the desire to experience these dopamine rushes can lead to dependency, particularly in games that combine this randomness with elements of player skill and decision-making.

To conclude, games like poker, which blend skill with the unpredictability of random chance, offer a unique appeal that can become dangerously addictive. While skill components provide a cover of legitimacy to the gambling experience, the random nature of these games can lead participants into a cycle of addiction, driven by the allure of mastering the unpredictable. Comparatively, simpler chance-based games such as slots may lead to addiction through different mechanisms, like the lure of fast-paced play and frequent payouts.



About the author

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.